FM / chrony

/usr/share/doc/chrony

Name	Size	Mode	Actions
examples/	-	0755	rm
changelog.Debian.gz	10913	0644	edit dl rm
copyright	5942	0644	edit dl rm
FAQ.gz	18636	0644	edit dl rm
NEWS.Debian.gz	370	0644	edit dl rm
NEWS.gz	12796	0644	edit dl rm
README.container	3120	0644	edit dl rm
README.Debian	1386	0644	edit dl rm
README.gz	2749	0644	edit dl rm

Edit: /usr/share/doc/chrony/README.container (3120B)

Chrony in Containers
--------------------

Currently in 99.9+% of the cases syncing the local clock in a container
is wrong. Most of the time it will be unable to do so, because it is lacking
CAP_SYS_TIME. Or worse, if the CAP_SYS_TIME privilege is granted, multiple
containers could fight over the system's time, because the Linux kernel does
not provide time namespaces (yet).

There are two things a user installing chrony usually wants:
1. synchronize my time (NTP client)
2. serve NTP (NTP server)

In a container the first makes (usually) no sense, so by default we enable -x
there (as it would only crash otherwise).
This will disable the control of the system clock.
See `man chronyd` for more details on the -x option.

Formerly, the check for Condition=CAP_SYS_TIME in the systemd service avoided
the crash of the NTP client portion, but that means the server use case will
not work by default in containers. It is still not recommended to use a
container as an NTP server, but if the host clock is synchronised via NTP,
adding the -x option to chronyd instances running in containers will allow
them to function as NTP servers which do not adjust the system clock.
The Condition=CAP_SYS_TIME check was a silent, no-log-entry stealing away
leaving users often unclear what happened - especially if they were more after
the NTP server than the NTP client.

One could argue that someone who installs chrony expects the system time to be
synchronised, so it should fail if it is not able to do so.  On the other hand
it could be argued that someone who installs chrony expects time to be served
over the network via NTP.
We can't know which expectation is applicable, so we assume that time should
be synchronised unless chronyd is running in a container (or is without
CAP_SYS_TIME in any other environment).

To make things worse recent container implementations will offer CAP_SYS_TIME
to the container. Since from the container's point of view, this capability is
available for the container's user namespace. Just later on adjtimex and similar
are actually evaluated against the host kernel where they will fail. Due to
that without further precaution running chrony in Ubuntu in the future will
likely have the service start (as Condition=CAP_SYS_TIME will be true) but
then immediately fail.
This will depend on the environment e.g. versions and types of containers and
thereby feel just 'unreliable' from users point of view.
Furthermore it will affect upgrades as the service has to be restarted for a
package upgrade to be considered complete.

Due to all of that Ubuntu decided (LP: #1589780) to default to -x (do not
set the system clock) in containers.

If one really wants to (try to) sync time in a container or CAP_SYS_TIME-less
environment set SYNC_IN_CONTAINER="yes" in /etc/default/chrony to disable
this special handling.

It is important to mention that as soon as upstream provides a way to provide
a default config working in those cases Ubuntu intends to use that and drop
the current workaround.

-- Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>  Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:25:44 +0100

cmd: